Archive for the 'Michigan' Category

Michigan Coalition Work Recognized

As part of the Put Michigan People First Coalition, PHI-HCHCW received the President’s Recognition Award from the Michigan Association of Health Plans.  This award was presented to us for being,” one of the key advocates for the “Put Michigan People First Coalition” which has made a positive impact on promoting consumer advocacy as well as accessibility and affordability to health care coverage in Michigan.”

As part of the Coalition, HCHCW has been working to make sure that the needs of direct-care workers are not forgotten in the individual market reform debate.   The Coalition has and will continue to advocate that the following components be present in the legislation that is finally passed later this year:

  • Continues the non-profit status of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and its social mission as Michigan’s insurer of last resort, accepting all who apply.
  • Retains the six-month waiting period before insurance benefits begin for people with existing conditions and extends this concept for all health insurance companies in Michigan.
  • Excludes the creation of a “high-risk” pool that would result in increased health insurance premium costs for those who are older and sicker.
  • Protects consumers with appropriate regulatory oversight by the attorney general and the Office of Financial and Insurance Regulation (OFIR).
  • Implements no significant changes to Blue Cross’ rating methodology that would include the consideration of health status.

If you would like to write your legislator about this issue, please contact Tameshia Bridges at (517) 372-8310 or tbridges@phinational.org for more information.

Tameshia Bridges
Michigan Senior Workforce Advocate
PHI/HCHCW
tbridges@phinational.org

HCHCW Fact Sheet Outlines Health Care Coverage for Michigan’s DCWs

When it comes to finding quality, affordable and accessible health insurance coverage, direct-care workers are stuck in the middle of a broken health care system. Caregivers Without Coverage, (pdf) a new Michigan fact sheet from Health Care for Health Care Workers, illustrates how that happens in Michigan and why it matters — to long-term care consumers and employers, as well as the workers themselves. 

Twenty-three percent of direct-care workers in Michigan - that’s about 27,000 people - do not have health insurance coverage.  They  earn too little to afford health insurance when it is offered, yet their income is too high to qualify for public coverage, even though direct-care workers average $5.32 an hour less than the state median. 

Other key facts detailed in Caregivers Without Coverage include:

  • How employer-sponsored health insurance reduces turnover, saving employers and the long-term care system money on recruitment and training;
  • The high rates of uninsurance among home care workers, and what that means for the growth of that popular sector of long-term care. 

Tameshia Bridges, PHI Michigan Senior Workforce Advocate
tbridges@phinational.org

HCHCW Joins Individual Market Reform Debate in Michigan

The Michigan HCHCW Campaign has been involved in the individual market reform debate since HB 5282 (pdf) and HB 5283 (pdf) were introduced in the Michigan House. The bills would change how Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM) would operate in the individual health insurance market, allowing BCBSM to:

  • set premium rates based on age and health status;
  • limit the ability of consumers and the Attorney General to challenge rate rate increases; and
  • establish a high-risk health pool. 

Michigan HCHCW looked at whether this legislation would make health insurance more affordable or accessible for direct-care workers. Our concern is that it would reduce access and increase cost and alter Blue Cross Blue Shield’s mission as the insurer of last resort in Michigan. 

Continue reading ‘HCHCW Joins Individual Market Reform Debate in Michigan’

Caregiving is Women’s Work

Caregiving is women’s work.

It is with that simple statement in mind that I went to the Raising Women’s Voices Conference last month, sponsored by the Avery Institute, Merger Watch, and the National Women’s Health Network.

I was invited to participate on the opening plenary panel to discuss voices that are traditionally left out of health care reform discussions. I talked about direct-care workers — and about Health Care for Health Care Workers and the broader work of PHI.

The conference brought together women’s health advocates, providers, and women in general to talk about health care issues and shape a women’s agenda for health care reform. There were the usual PowerPoint presentations and policy recommendations, but the way the organizers encouraged presenters to tell our stories made it clear from the start that this was no ordinary conference. Raising Women’s Voices lived up to its name, honoring the power of women’s voices and experiences as consumers and providers.

Continue reading ‘Caregiving is Women’s Work’

Make Direct-Care Workers a Face of Uninsured Women, Says Bridges

Direct-care workers can “serve as a face of uninsured women,” Tameshia Bridges of the PHI Health Care for Health Care Workers campaign told a roomful of health care reform advocates at a Families USA conference.

Bridges and Lisa Codispoti of the National Women’s Law Center paired up to present their January 26 workshop, Putting Women in the Picture: The Face of Women in the Health Care Crisis (pdf). “This was a good opportunity to partner with a national women’s organization to highlight how direct-care issues are really women’s issues,” says Bridges.

Attendees included “people from all over, from Oregon to Florida, most of them from state-based health care reform advocacy campaigns,” says Bridges. “They asked really good questions. I think we gave them a framework to look at how women are impacted by health care reforms.”

The presentation also led to an invitation to present on the same issue at the Raising Women’s Voices to be held this April by the Avery Institute for Social Change, MergerWatch, and the National Women’s Health Network.

Michigan Advocates Learn How to Talk About Health Care Reform

Eric Schneidewind of AARP Michigan, Lake, Hollis Turnham and Tameshia Bridges of Health Care for Health Care Workers, and Steve Gools of AARP MichiganLong-term care provider and consumer representatives, health care advocates and researchers, labor, and foundation staff from across the state of Michigan recently met to learn about the importance of health care among voters and what language is most effective when talking about health care reform.

Celinda Lake, president of Lake Research, presented findings from a Herndon Alliance survey on voters’ values and perspectives on health care reform at a November 19 breakfast forum in Lansing. The forum was co-hosted by Health Care for Health Care Workers and AARP Michigan. (Pictured above, left to right: Eric Schneidewind of AARP Michigan, Lake, Hollis Turnham and Tameshia Bridges of Health Care for Health Care Workers, and Steve Gools of AARP Michigan.)

Michigan voters, like those nationwide, identify health care as the third most important issue after the economy. The top concern for Michigan voters is jobs, while the top concern nationwide is Iraq.

Choosing the right words when talking about health care is important to winning support for reform efforts, Lake pointed out. The term “quality, affordable healthcare” resonates much more with voters than “universal healthcare” because it addresses the quality and cost of health care, which are a concern for both insured and uninsured voters.

Lake said small business owners are an important and untapped resource in building support for health care reform, noting that a primary concern among women small-business owners is providing health insurance for their staff. Lake’s organization also noticed this small business connection among long-term care employers in focus groups conducted for Health Care for Health Care Workers in Pennsylvania.

The link to small businesses has significant implications for Health Care for Health Care Workers. The campaign is looking for opportunities to connect with more long-term care providers in our effort to bring the voice of all stakeholders – workers, consumers, and employers – to our work.

Michigan Senate Passes MI-HEART Bills

The embattled Michigan First health insurance plan passed another hurdle on October 4 when the senate unanimously approved three bills to create the Michigan Health Ensure Affordable and Reliable Treatment (MI-HEART) exchange, which would facilitate implementation of the plan. Michigan First would ensure many of the state’s one million-plus residents without insurance.

The Michigan House has yet to vote on the bills to create The MI-HEART exchange.

Forum Focuses on Securing Better Coverage for Michigan Direct-Care Workers

Tameshia Bridges, Health Care for Health Care Workers’ Michigan Senior Health Policy Analyst, spoke today at a forum (pdf) on how to secure better health care coverage for Michigan’s direct-care workers.

Bridges was joined by Jeff Fortenbacher, executive director of Access Health Inc., who explained how to direct-care workers in Muskegon and North Ottawa counties can secure health care coverage through Access Health.

The forum took place at the Grand Valley State University MAREC Center in Muskegon.

HCHCW Wins Significant Amendments to MI HEART Bill

HCHCW staff participated in an April workgroup to provide input into the creation of a board that would help administer the Michigan First Health Care Plan. Called the MI-HEART Exchange, the board would run the program, operating as an independent body within the Department of Community Health.

The workgroup, which was chaired by Senator Tom George (R-Kalamazoo), analyzed SB 278 (pdf), the law that would create the exchange. The group included legislative staff, physicians, and representatives from health plans, insurance companies, and hospitals. HCHCW was the only advocacy organization represented.

HCHCW staff provided detailed comments (pdf) and recommendations (pdf) on the draft legislation. As a result, the following HCHCW recommendations were included in the new draft:

  • Appointing a representative from a low-income health care advocacy organization to the Exchange board.
  • Adopting a phased-in approach, offering coverage to individuals for six months before including small businesses, to allow the plan administrators time to address any challenges that may surface.
  • Establishing criteria for the selection of health plans that participate in the program.
  • Allowing covered individuals whose work hours are decreased to retain their coverage. This protects home care workers, whose fluctuating hours often leave them with too little work in a given month to qualify for most health insurance plans.

SB 278 S-2 was passed out of the Senate Health Policy Committee in early May and is awaiting a vote by the full Senate.

I Can’t Afford To Cover My Workers

Karen BasileA testimonial from Karen B., a home care agency manager in Michigan:

I am a manager for a home-care agency with between 150 and 200 employees. I feel caught between a rock and a hard spot because I have so many employees and so little profit margin. There is no way I can afford to offer health benefits. It’s a horrible place to be in. If anybody in my family were to get sick, we have insurance, but my workers don’t. Continue reading ‘I Can’t Afford To Cover My Workers’

7 Years. 300 Direct-Care Workers.

Eric ThomasA testimonial from Eric T., a home care consumer in Michigan:

I’ve had over 300 direct-care workers in the last seven years. None of them have had health insurance from their work. They may have had it through their spouse, but this was very few of them.

I’ve had a couple workers for five to seven years, but mostly they stay around 18 months. Sometimes I only see a worker one time and then they (the agency) send a different person the next day. I get fill-in staff a lot.

I think workers would stay longer in the job if they had health insurance. It would mean less stress for them, it would make them believe in their job more and help them get something out of it. My workers do a lot of lifting and other physical work. The heavy work they put in now will catch up with their bodies in the future. They need to have a healthy life and be able to take care of their families.

They’re taking care of people who get care through Medicaid but they can’t get insurance themselves. The state’s Medicaid dollars are used to take care of people who need long-term care, so the same funds should be used to cover the workers providing the care.

HCHCW Michigan Works with Governor, Legislature on MI First and LTC System Reform

HCHCW Michigan continues to meet with staff from Governor Granholm’s office, the Department of Community Health, and the Michigan legislature to provide input into the design of the Michigan First Healthcare Plan. Our comments have focused on how to make the program accessible and affordable (pdf) to direct-care workers and how to market it effectively (pdf). The state is still in negotiations with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services about funding for the plan. A decision is anticipated this spring.

HCHCW Michigan also continues to advocate for maintaining services for long-term care consumers despite the state’s current economic crisis.

Survey Finds High Uninsurance Rate among Home Help Workers

Nearly a third of Michigan’s Home Help providers are uninsured, according to When Michigan Caregivers Lack Coverage (pdf), a survey of the Home Help workforce, which provides home care services to Medicaid recipients.

The survey was conducted by HCHCW Michigan and funded by the Michigan Quality Home Care Coalition. Among its findings are the following:

  • The uninsurance rate among Home Help providers is almost three times as high as that of the state’s general population.
  • A third of the providers who have insurance are covered by Medicaid and/or Medicare. Another third get it through a second job or a spouse.
  • Home help providers pay significant out-of-pocket health care expenses despite low household incomes. More than half (56 percent) report household incomes of less than $30,000 a year.
  • Half of those without health insurance say they have chosen not to seen a doctor when they needed one.